You’ve found the employee of your dreams: they have the right experience, they impressed during the interview, and they’re ready to start once they’ve served their notice.
So, of course, you send them the offer letter and they sign it. However, before their start date, the candidate contacts you to say that they are declining the job offer, due to a better offer somewhere else.
For seasoned HR practitioners, this situation comes up fairly often. It can be a frustrating experience, so here’s what you need to know: what if a candidate declines the position before the start date, but after signing the offer letter?
Typically, the offer letter begins the relationship between the company and the candidate. The terms and conditions of the offer (e.g. salary, benefits etc) would have been negotiated – often verbally – beforehand. The offer letter puts it in black and white.
But the crux of the matter is: does the offer letter create a binding relationship between the employer and employee?
By creating a binding relationship, neither party can walk away from the relationship without paying a penalty. Ordinarily, this would take the form of monetary compensation.
And, to create a binding relationship, you need an employment contract. Is the offer letter equivalent to an employment contract?
Basically, according to Malaysia’s Employment Act 1955, an employment contract or ‘contract of service’ means “any agreement, whether oral or in writing and whether express or implied, whereby one person agrees to employ another as an employee and that other agrees to serve his employer as an employee.”
Based on this definition, the offer letter is more than sufficient to create a binding relationship of employment. However, a recent Industrial Court decision clarifies the position of the offer letter. The court ruled that:
Essentially, we can say that if the offer letter sent to the candidate is complete with the necessary terms and conditions, it can indeed form a binding employment contract.
Technically, by declining the offer after signing the offer letter, the candidate has committed a breach of contract. The company could, in theory, sue for damages.
Practically though, the chances of that working are zero. You will need to prove somehow that the employee failing to follow through with the job offer has caused damages. Given that many companies’ onboarding programs are designed with a probation period in mind, it is very unlikely that any substantial losses would have been incurred.
In the event that the prospective employee gained a benefit before the start date, e.g. by attending an employer-sponsored health checkup, the company can ask for the money back. However, this may be more trouble than its worth, especially when only a hundred ringgit here and there is involved.
So what’s the best course of action for HR?
The answer is: to move on. Let that candidate go and contact the second-choice candidate. Taking legal action for something that’s all too common for HR practitioners is overkill. Plus, the legal (and stress-related) costs are likely not worth it.
At the end of the day, your energies are better used to enhance your recruitment program, including employer branding strategies and better onboarding.
Recruitment can be a tricky process. With BrioHR’s recruitment module, you can track applicants and make the hiring process go by much more smoothly. Besides, you can also create a professional-looking careers page to make the best first impression on a potential hire.
With 9 powerful modules, BrioHR’s software covers the entire employee journey from recruitment to onboarding, payroll and claims, to performance and analytics, and more.
This enables business owners and HR teams to truly focus on what matters most – people.
Visit briohr.com and get a free demo now.
You’ve found the employee of your dreams: they have the right experience, they impressed during the interview, and they’re ready to start once they’ve served their notice.
So, of course, you send them the offer letter and they sign it. However, before their start date, the candidate contacts you to say that they are declining the job offer, due to a better offer somewhere else.
For seasoned HR practitioners, this situation comes up fairly often. It can be a frustrating experience, so here’s what you need to know: what if a candidate declines the position before the start date, but after signing the offer letter?
Typically, the offer letter begins the relationship between the company and the candidate. The terms and conditions of the offer (e.g. salary, benefits etc) would have been negotiated – often verbally – beforehand. The offer letter puts it in black and white.
But the crux of the matter is: does the offer letter create a binding relationship between the employer and employee?
By creating a binding relationship, neither party can walk away from the relationship without paying a penalty. Ordinarily, this would take the form of monetary compensation.
And, to create a binding relationship, you need an employment contract. Is the offer letter equivalent to an employment contract?
Basically, according to Malaysia’s Employment Act 1955, an employment contract or ‘contract of service’ means “any agreement, whether oral or in writing and whether express or implied, whereby one person agrees to employ another as an employee and that other agrees to serve his employer as an employee.”
Based on this definition, the offer letter is more than sufficient to create a binding relationship of employment. However, a recent Industrial Court decision clarifies the position of the offer letter. The court ruled that:
Essentially, we can say that if the offer letter sent to the candidate is complete with the necessary terms and conditions, it can indeed form a binding employment contract.
Technically, by declining the offer after signing the offer letter, the candidate has committed a breach of contract. The company could, in theory, sue for damages.
Practically though, the chances of that working are zero. You will need to prove somehow that the employee failing to follow through with the job offer has caused damages. Given that many companies’ onboarding programs are designed with a probation period in mind, it is very unlikely that any substantial losses would have been incurred.
In the event that the prospective employee gained a benefit before the start date, e.g. by attending an employer-sponsored health checkup, the company can ask for the money back. However, this may be more trouble than its worth, especially when only a hundred ringgit here and there is involved.
So what’s the best course of action for HR?
The answer is: to move on. Let that candidate go and contact the second-choice candidate. Taking legal action for something that’s all too common for HR practitioners is overkill. Plus, the legal (and stress-related) costs are likely not worth it.
At the end of the day, your energies are better used to enhance your recruitment program, including employer branding strategies and better onboarding
Recruitment can be a tricky process. With BrioHR’s recruitment module, you can track applicants and make the hiring process go by much more smoothly. Besides, you can also create a professional-looking careers page to make the best first impression on a potential hire.
With 9 powerful modules, BrioHR’s software covers the entire employee journey from recruitment to onboarding, payroll and claims, to performance and analytics, and more.
This enables business owners and HR teams to truly focus on what matters most – people.
Visit briohr.com and get a free demo now.